Manejo racional de las neuropatías diabéticas: consenso multidisciplinario de expertos / Rational management of the diabetic neuropathies: a multidisciplinary expert group consensus

Resumen: La diabetes mellitus, un padecimiento crónico y progresivo, ocupó el tercer lugar en defunciones durante el período comprendido de enero a junio de 2021 en México. Su complicación crónica más frecuente es la neuropatía diabética que tiene un impacto importante en el sistema nervioso. En la Ciudad de México se reunió un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos para establecer un algoritmo de tratamiento que considere los aspectos sintomáticos y etiopatogénicos de la neuropatía diabética. Se utilizó un método Delphi en tiempo real con dos rondas de preguntas interactivas. La implementación del algoritmo propuesto permitirá abordar de manera integral al paciente diabético con neuropatía dolorosa y no dolorosa, tanto en el terreno de los síntomas como en la etiopatogenia. Este abordaje brinda la oportunidad de mejorar la calidad de vida y lograr la reinserción a la vida familiar y laboral. El panel de expertos recomienda al ácido tióctico como tratamiento etiopatogénico de primera línea en la neuropatía diabética.

Abstract: Diabetes mellitus, a chronic and progressive condition, was the third most common cause of death in Mexico between January and June 2021. Its most frequent chronic complication is diabetic neuropathy, which has a major impact on the nervous system. A multidisciplinary group of experts met in Mexico City to establish a treatment algorithm considering the symptomatic and etiopathogenic aspects of diabetic neuropathy. A real-time Delphi method with two rounds of interative questions was used. The implementation of the proposed algorithm will allow a comprehensive approach to the diabetic patient with painful and non-painful neuropathy, both in terms of symptoms and etiopathogenesis. This approach provides the opportunity to improve quality of life and achieve reintegration into family and work life. The expert panel recommends thioctic acid as the first line etiopathogenic treatment for diabetic neuropathy.

Computed tomography-guided Gasserian ganglion interventions for cancer-related facial pain in patients with complex anatomy: insights and recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The Gasserian ganglion is a well-known target for facial pain management, and patients with cancer present an anatomical challenge owing to tumor progression or treatment itself. Computed tomography (CT) is an alternative method for guiding these procedures. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective analysis of patients with cancer-related facial pain who underwent CT-guided Gasserian ganglion interventions using local anesthetics, local anesthetics with steroids, phenol, and radiofrequency. Demographic, clinical, and procedure-related variables were collected from January 1, 2015, to December 30, 2018, at the National Cancer Institute. Data distribution was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A paired sample t-test (with a cut-off of P < 0.05 for statistical significance) was used for comparing outcome. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in numerical rating scale (NRS) and douleur neuropathique 4 (DN4) scores from 7.6 ± 1.4 and 4.4 ± 1.4 to 3.2 ± 2.0 and 2.2 ± 1.4 points, respectively (P < 0.001). After the procedure, 70.8% of the patients were satisfied; 16.7% were very satisfied, and 12.5% were unsatisfied. No intra- or postoperative complications were observed. The most common neoplasms were head and neck tumors (83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CT guidance is an effective and safe option for managing cancer-related facial pain in patients with complex anatomy, resulting in a significant reduction in pain, high satisfaction rates, and no mechanical complications. Future research should aim to refine the role of CT guidance in multimodal pain management in this population.

Effectiveness of Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis for Pelvic Cancer Pain.

BACKGROUND: The superior hypogastric plexus block has been indicated for visceral pelvic pain treatment associated with malignancy. The first international report of this technique was published by Plancarte et al, in which a posterior percutaneous approach guided by fluoroscopy was described by applying neurolytic agents. The considerable variability in the data reported gave rise to 2 clinical approaches to those who performed the blockade early and those who executed it at a later stage of cancer. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to provide more evidence regarding the effectiveness of this procedure. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive study. SETTING: The study was held at the pain unit service of the National Cancer Institute, Mexico City. METHODS: A nonprobabilistic sample was selected; the data collection took place from January 2006 to December 2016 with patients diagnosed with pelvic pain, confirmed by imaging and biopsy studies. Patients who received any other type of intervention of the sympathetic axis, patients with a different approach than the classic or paravertebral technique, and patients with low survival rate were excluded. The Student t test was used to measure the significant difference between Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and morphine equivalent daily dose. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and the Gamma test were used to measure the association between the initial Karnofsky and blockade success. RESULTS: The study included a total of 180 patients. The success rate was 59.4% at 1 month, 55.5% at 3 months, and 48.8% at 6 months. There was a sustained and significant VAS reduction that was 49.55% at 3 months. A significant reduction in opioid consumption of 12.55% was found at 3 months. There was no significant statistical evidence related to either opioid consumption or the functionality of the patient before the blockade as an influential variable in the success of the procedure. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, developed in a single center. CONCLUSIONS: Although opioids remain the cornerstone of cancer pain treatment, they produce many deleterious side effects. The superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis represents a reproducible and effective alternative in the management of pain in this group of patients. KEY WORDS: Pelvic pain, neoplasms, chemical neurolysis, pain management, cancer pain, palliative care, analgesia, nerve block.

Risk of New Fractures in Vertebroplasty for Multiple Myeloma. A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Vertebroplasty is a percutaneous minimally invasive procedure indicated for vertebral collapse pain treatment. Among the known complications of the procedure is the augmented risk of new vertebral fractures. There are no specific studies in this patient population describing the risk of new vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty. This study analyzed risk factors associated with new vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: Observational retrospective study in patients with multiple myeloma. The data collection took place from January 1, 2010, to December 30, 2017, at the National Cancer Institute. Clinical data and procedural variables such as cement volume, cement leaks, fracture level, number of treated vertebrae, pedicular disease, and cement distribution pattern, with two years follow-up, were analyzed with the Wilcoxon test, and a logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors related to new vertebral fractures. A confidence interval of 95% was used for analysis. RESULTS: At one-year follow-up, 30% of fractures were reported after vertebroplasty, most of them at low thoracic and lumbar level (50% adjacent level). Vertebroplasty was most commonly performed at the thoracolumbar and lumbar area. We demonstrated a 70.7% median numerical rating scale reduction at one-year follow-up; a significant decrease in opioid consumption occurred only during the first month. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle involvement, disc leakage, cement volume, thoracolumbar and lumbar level, and number of treated vertebrae by intervention are important risk factors when performing vertebroplasty. Prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate these factors in this specific population.

[Complex regional pain syndrome: A review]. / Síndrome doloroso regional complejo: revisión.

BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome is characterized by spontaneous or induced pain disproportionate in relation to the initial event and is accompanied by a variety of regional and motor disturbances, leading to a variety of clinical presentations. It is often associated with surgery and minor trauma. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY: Three mechanisms are postulated: changes secondary to post traumatic inflammation, peripheral vasomotor dysfunction and structural and functional changes of the central nervous system as a result of maladaptation. DIAGNOSIS: made based on the criteria of Budapest. The patient must have one symptom and sign of each criterion at diagnosis: Continuing pain, disproportionate to any inciting event. A sensory, vasomotor, oedema and motor/trophic change sign and symptoms that are not explained by another diagnosis or cause. TREATMENT: Multimodal treatment is suggested. There is no gold standard. In early stage NSAIDs or steroids can be used. Drugs used for neuropathic pain treatment have been suggested, but there is not enough evidence for any of these. There is low evidence that bisphosphonates, calcitonin, ketamine and mirror therapy are effective compared to placebo. Interventional treatment should be stepped from epidural block, neurostimulation, intrathecal pump to experimental therapies in case of intractable pain. DISCUSSION: Although complex regional pain syndrome has been a recognized entity for over 100 years, no clear evidence exists for first-line treatments; however, new technologies that are applicable in complex regional pain syndrome treatment have been developed.